Emotional Intelligence and Self Efficacy: Influencing the Psychological Well Being of Teachers
Keywords:
Emotional Intelligence, Self Efficacy, Psychological Well-BeingAbstract
The current study looked into how self-efficacy and emotional intelligence relate to psychological well-being. The study used a correlational design. 440 academic members from recently established universities were selected as a sample. The sample consisted of 286 students from the University of Sargodha and 154 students from the University of Gujarat. The proportionate stratified random sampling technique was used to choose the sample. The constructs were measured using the Ryff & Keyes (1995) Psychological Well-Being Scale, the Schwarzer & Jerusalem (1995) General Self Efficacy Scale, and Khan & Kamal (2010) Self Report Measure of Emotional Intelligence. Regression analysis was used to analyze the findings. According to the analysis, psychological well-being was predicted by emotional intelligence and self-efficacy. According to the investigation, the combined influence of general self-efficacy and emotional intelligence was the reason of the difference in teachers' psychological well-being. Emotional intelligence and psychological well-being did not significantly correlate at the individual level, although general self-efficacy did. The current study also found that the combination of all factors—emotional intelligence, general self-efficacy, manner of living, sex, marital status, and mode of residence—explains the shift in psychological well-being. However, the role of general self-efficacy is significant and individually other factors resulted as non-significant. Moreover, females found to have better psychological well-being as compared to males. Mode of residence in form of native and non-native has been identified that non-native teachers have better psychological well-being than native teachers. These differences are not statistically significant.
References
Adeyemo, D. A., & Adeleye, A. T. (2008). Emotional Intelligence, Religiosity and.Self-Efficacy as Predictors of Psychological Well-Being among Secondary School Adolescents in Ogbomoso, Nigeria. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 4(1), 100-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v4i1.423
Adeyemo, D.A., & Ogunyemi,B. (2007). Emotional Intelligence and Self-Efficacy as Predictors of Occupational Stress among Academic Staff in a NigerianUniversity. E Journal of organizational learning and leadership, 7(2). http://www.leadingtoday.org/weleadinlearning/da05.htm
Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. New Jersey, Prentice Hall.
Goleman, D. (1998). Working with emotional intelligence. NY: Bantam Books.
Khan, R. A., & Kamal, A. (2010). Self-Report Measure of Emotional Intelligence. National Institute of Psychology. Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad.
Mathews,G., Zeidner, M., & Robberts, R. (2002). Emotional Intelligence, Science and Myth. London: MIT Press.
Salovey, P. E., & Sluyter, D. J. (1997). Emotional development and emotional intelligence: Educational implications. Basic Books.
Mayer, J. D., Salovey, P., Caruso, D. R., & Sternberg, R. J. (2000). Models of emotional intelligence. JD Mayer.
Penrose, A., Perry, C., & Ball, I. (2007). Emotional Intelligence and Teachers Self Efficacy: The Contribution of Teacher Status and Length of Experience.Issues In Educational Research, 17(1), 107-126.
Ryff, C., & Keyes, C. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 719–727. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.719
Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston (Eds.), Measures in Health Psychology: A User’s Portfolio. Causal and Control Beliefs (pp. 35-37). Windsor: NFER-NELSON.
